Skip navigation

Activist-turned-judge plays moderator at SFU

B.C. judge Zahid Makhdoom moderates debate at Simon Fraser's Philosopher’s Café


When Zahid Makhdoom was named a Justice of the Peace for British Columbia, the well-known writer had to give up his political and social activism. Instead, he found a natural outlet for that impulse by becoming a moderator for Simon Fraser University’s popular and much copied Philosopher’s Café.

Mr. Makhdoom fled to Canada from Pakistan after being imprisoned and tortured for publicly airing his views on law, democracy and secularism. He first found work advocating for First Nations communities in Canada and the United States, then ran in Canada’s 1993 federal election. His judicial appointment in 1996, however, required him to give up his activist activities.

The Philosophers’ Café, he says, is a way to continue his interest in building a thoughtful society. “It reminded me of the very vibrant and powerful café culture in Pakistan, where writers and activists of all stripes engaged in important debates and discourses.”

The Philosophers’ Café – started at SFU more than 10 years ago by Yosef Wosk, director of interdisciplinary programs in continuing studies – offers topics for discussion in public venues, usually moderated by members of the community with an interest or background in philosophy and the arts.

Mr. Makhdoom has been leading the café at a coffee shop in Vancouver’s east end for the past two and a half years. Regulars and newcomers arriving to discuss questions in philosophy, politics or science are often greeted with a warm hug from the gregarious judge. The atmosphere is relaxed and casual, a direct reflection of his ability to put everyone at ease.

Mr. Makhdoom uses the same techniques in his courtroom as he does at the café. “As a judicial officer serving in a high-volume court, I have a duty to impartially and independently adjudicate,” he explains. “I must actively listen.”

As a moderator of the Philosophers’ Café, “I also must actively listen, draw out the silent ones and respectfully ensure everyone has an equal opportunity to engage. … Above all, I must remain impartial and committed only to the free flow of ideas.”

The judge, it seems, has found a second home.

Post a comment
University Affairs moderates all comments according to the following guidelines. If approved, comments generally appear within one business day. We may republish particularly insightful remarks in our print edition or elsewhere.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Larry Tallman / December 28, 2022 at 00:36

    I came to know Mr. Makhdoom first as a judge and then at a couple of the Philosophers’ Café events. As a judge, and I as a Parking Enforcement Officer, he held court as would a community leader. He definitely paid attention to what was said and did not go beyond the law. But he looked for solutions that included the concept of ‘justice’ more so than in any of the other courtrooms I was in. And at the Philosophers’ Café events (I only remember one) the room was packed with all ages and genders. Leading the discussion but never overbearing, he elicited penetrating commentary. (The topic was something about whether new technologies were reducing the degree of human contact.) It was just before he was to go mountain climbing. I have not seen him since as my job required an evening shift until I retired. But if I could renew contact with him via this venue, I would be much appreciative.

Click to fill out a quick survey