Skip navigation

Sequestered students write space-science papers in 10 days

Rocky Mountain retreat brought together Norwegian and Canadian students to roll up their sleeves and get to work.


Take a dozen or so graduate students, add a pile of raw satellite data for them to analyze and sequester them in a remote location for 10 days. The end goal: the preparation of two scientific papers ready for publication.

That was the recipe for a high-intensity graduate course for budding Canadian and Norwegian space researchers held last November at the University of Calgary’s Barrier Lake field station in the mountains west of Calgary. The course was an offshoot of the CaNoRock STEP program, a Norway-Canada student exchange program in space physics and space electronics that sees Canadian undergraduate students travel each summer to the Andøya Rocket Range in northern Norway. In turn, the Norwegian partners in the program came to Canada last fall to lead the special graduate course. (The 2014 PhD school will be held at the end of July in Norway.)

“The concept of the [PhD] course was to take a leading-edge space physics problem, have 10 to 12 very talented and eager young students who have good programming skills and lots of energy to do the data analysis … and over the course of 10 days, to complete scientific papers for publication – and actually submit them,” said Kathryn McWilliams, an associate professor at the University of Saskatchewan’s Institute for Space and Atmospheric Studies and one of the organizers of the CaNoRock STEP school.

“Seeing the focus and seeing how well everything worked, we [the instructors] were trying to figure out how we could build this into our normal lives and maybe in our own research groups,” said Dr. McWilliams. “It was really positive.”

The students were provided with a sheaf of scientific papers to read before the course to bring them up to speed. The instructors loaded raw data sets from two different satellites and the ground-based SuperDARN network, all of which gather information on the Earth’s stormy, electrically charged upper atmosphere.

After a bit of initial instruction, the students were turned loose to do the analysis and come up with some conclusions suitable for Geophysical Research Letters, a leading journal in the field. It made for some long days, said Dr. McWilliams, but the two teams of six students had all their needs, including rooms and meals, taken care of so they could focus solely on their goal.

“It was literally just get up, shower, shave, eat some breakfast in about half an hour, then get down to the lab and start working,” said PhD student Ashton Reimer. “You were up for about 17 hours. You had one hour for lunch and one hour for supper, so it was about a 14-hour work day.”

With no time to waste, the students had to be self-starters and self-organizers, recognizing where their talents might fit in to the team, said Dr. McWilliams. For example, some team members wrote software to analyze data while others delved into background research to fill holes they had identified.

“We didn’t have too much of, ‘you do this and you do this,’” said Matt Wessel, one of a handful of master’s students at the school. “We were able to figure out what we could do and that worked pretty well.”

The teams adopted very different writing strategies as well. While the members of Mr. Reimer’s and Mr. Wessel’s group wrote blocks of copy to assemble into a whole before a final group edit, PhD student Gareth Perry’s team tackled the writing line by line.

“When we finished all the analysis and got ready to write the paper, our group sat around a table with a projector,” he said. “We had the text of the paper, and we just started writing by committee, essentially – literally sentence by sentence. I had never done anything like that before. It was painstaking, but it gave us good results. It took about five minutes to get a sentence down.”

At the end of the 10 days, both groups had successfully prepared a paper. The teams gathered around a laptop for the final collaboration – to push the “submit” button on the journal’s website.

While the journal’s reviewers scrutinize their work, Dr. McWilliams has another job in mind for the graduates of the CaNoRock STEP PhD school – a pedagogical paper on the school itself as an effective teaching method.

“We’re going to reverse the process,” she said. “We’re going to write the paper with their guidance; that’s what we’re hoping.”

A different version of this story first appeared in the University of Saskatchewan’s On Campus News.

Post a comment
University Affairs moderates all comments according to the following guidelines. If approved, comments generally appear within one business day. We may republish particularly insightful remarks in our print edition or elsewhere.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *