It’s a professor’s duty to teach proper essay writing
These six strategies can easily be implemented as part of a proactive approach to essay writing.

Each semester, my colleagues complain that university papers are either poorly written or plagiarized to some degree. What is often overlooked, however, is the role professors play in mitigating these problems. Effective strategies can easily be implemented as part of a proactive approach to essay writing.
Step 1: Assign an actual essay
Some professors have abandoned essays, describing them as “unpleasant for students to write” and “boring for instructors to read.” Others claim that they do not have the time to mark them, due largely to publishing commitments, family responsibilities and, in the case of part-time professors, a second job. Imagine if a student used the same excuses for missing assignments. “Sorry, but I didn’t have the time to complete them because of my part-time job, my sports schedule, and my social life.” But if students are expected to hand in assigned work to the best of their abilities, surely professors can find the time to grade essays and provide abundant feedback. If workload is a concern, the essay can be shortened, with an emphasis on quality over quantity. Professors can hardly complain about the poor state of writing if they have all but given up on assigning essays.
Step 2: Set aside class time for essay instructions
I have been told countless times that universities exist to promote research; essay tips are for high school. The reality is, the terminal degree for most students is the undergraduate degree. They are not going to become professional researchers but do require basic writing skills for whatever occupation they choose after graduation. For first-year undergraduate courses, professors could easily set aside one period per course per semester to explain essay guidelines in detail and to teach the mechanics of academic writing.
Step 3: Use office hours to edit essays
Too often, students who need help with their essays are told to go to the campus’s academic writing centre, or they are directed to the teaching assistant. These options have limitations. If the professor offered a critical eye during office hours, issues such as awkward phrasing, wordy passages, weak diction and inaccurate points or proofs would be immediately identified. It does not take long to proofread one or two paragraphs and to acknowledge skills problems.
Step 4: Provide an exemplar of an A+ essay
When students enter classes straight out of high school, many do not grasp the style and expectations of a university-level paper. There is no better way to facilitate this understanding than to provide an A+ exemplar of a previously written essay. After courses are completed, I ask the top three students in each class to resubmit by email a polished copy of their papers. The next semester, I place these essays online so that new students are fully aware of the expectations involving format, structure and grammar.
Step 5: Implement plagiarism safeguards
Professors should avoid assigning the same paper year after year. This kind of apathy only invites cheating. The challenge – and the fun – is to design a new essay for each class, with original ideas that truly engage students. Asking undergraduates to write an essay on broad topics is equally problematic. Essay topics that are too general can be easily downloaded or purchased. To minimize plagiarism, professors can provide a selection of topics to analyze, offer a list of mandatory sources, demand qualitative and quantitative evidence, and establish a quotation range (i.e., 12 to 15 for a first-year paper).
Step 6: Treat frivolous cases of plagiarism as “teachable moments”
There is a clear difference between actual cheating (i.e., copying and pasting exact paragraphs or long passages from a source) and honest mistakes due to inexperience. For example, a student may forget to place quotation marks around the proof. If this occurred only once in the entire essay, it’s simply an oversight. Overuse of paraphrasing can also lead to accusations of plagiarism. For a discourse analysis, this is easily resolved by insisting on exact quotations as evidence. If a student paraphrased only once or twice but used quotations throughout the paper, there is clearly no intent to steal an author’s ideas. Rectifying these mistakes should be treated as “teachable moments,” not charges of academic fraud. The goal it to instill confidence in writing, not to crush a student’s potential.
Stuart Chambers teaches in the school of sociological and anthropological studies at the University of Ottawa.
Featured Jobs
- Psychology - Assistant Professor (Human Neuroscience or Quantitative Methods)University of New Brunswick
- Accounting - Tenured or Tenure-Track Faculty PositionUniversity of Alberta
- Critical Studies of Technology, Sustainability, and Development - Postdoctoral Researcher Ontario Tech University
- Psychology - Assistant Professor (Social)Mount Saint Vincent University
- Research Chair in Systems Transformation and Family Justice (Faculty Position)University of Calgary
Post a comment
University Affairs moderates all comments according to the following guidelines. If approved, comments generally appear within one business day. We may republish particularly insightful remarks in our print edition or elsewhere.
7 Comments
I agree with much of what you’re saying. When it comes to research essays though, all Departments ought to have a mandatory theory and methods course that would teach students some of these skills, including proper sourcing, citation, etc. Too many forego this, to the detriment of instructors and students alike.
I read this while sitting in my office waiting for students to pick up essays so they could read their (extensive) feedback. So far, after several posted office hours on two separate days, less than five students have picked up their essays (in a class of nearly 70). This is becoming the norm. I spend one 60-90 minute class a semester in first year courses going through the nuts and bolts of essay writing, with multiple best and worst examples, links to style guides, warnings about my irritation with sweeping introductory lines they obviously encourage in high school (“Since the dawn of time…”) and, of course, details about plagiarism.
I sense that my efforts aren’t making much of a difference. If students don’t read feedback how will they learn? I don’t think we should take all the responsibility away from them.
Diane, I can perhaps add something to your comment. I correct the essays and then give them back (almost all of them) before the last class so that the vast majority have to see their mark and read the paper’s comments. The rest pick them up at the final exam, and that means that every student gets his/her essay back. Once they leave the final exam, they may go travelling or go home, and then they forget to pick up the essay.
Regarding this sentence:
“If workload is a concern, the essay can be shortened, with an emphasis on quality over quantity.”
It reminds me of a wonderful Churchillian anecdote in which he said to his secretary:
“I’m writing a long speech today, because I don’t have time to write a short one!”
When I assigned the end-of-term essay in my history of biology class, it “counted” for a whole 50% of the final course grade (Yes: 50%!), and the length was limited to 5 double-spaced pages, 12-point font!! (They were permitted, however, “unlimited” length for footnotes/figures and the like.) But I did give elaborate feedback on an outline, a first-draft (mandatory) and a second-draft (not required). Interesting how most of the stronger essay writers tended to submit a 2nd-draft and most of the weaker ones didn’t.
Just to clarify: Each student chooses his/her own topic in this course.
Great advice, Stuart. I especially appreciate point #4, and I realize I need to do more of this. Giving students examples of what good writing looks like is so beneficial. Plus hopefully it helps them avoid the jargon-filled prose found in many academic books and articles. After all, we learn through imitation.
Over the years I’ve also experimented with electronic marking, and I especially like the option of adding audio comments. It’s much quicker and easier to talk for a minute than to add a written paragraph or two. It’s also more personal. In case anyone wants to try this option, you can check out my detailed tutorial here: https://natureofwriting.com/electronic-grading/
The one thing I don’t do is use rubrics. While they can be very useful, a lot of instructors overuse them, to the point where students find out they got a certain number in a category without seeing in detail what’s actually wrong. I prefer to just edit the assignment directly.
Wise advice indeed …. I too posted a few “excellent essays” from former students after gaining their permission. The fact that the topics would all be different from each other seemed to be no problem