-
AI in universities: the case in favour
Joël Blit argues integrating AI into curricula and pedagogy can make universities more human, not less.
Joël Blit argues integrating AI into curricula and pedagogy can make universities more human, not less.
Ping Lam Ip and Andrea DeKeseredy argue generative artificial intelligence has no place in higher education.
Henry A. Giroux argues that the militarization of Canadian universities threatens to transform institutions devoted to critical inquiry and democratic life into extensions of the warfare state.
Martin Maltais argues that Canadian universities must play a greater role in strengthening the country’s defence capacity while preserving academic freedom and scientific independence.
Supporting displaced academics is a strategic investment in Canada's research and innovation ecosystem.
Yves Gingras argues that ‘equity, diversity and inclusion’ bureaucrats are practicing the art of intellectual confusion.
Malinda S. Smith argues that equity strengthens excellence in university hiring and admissions.
Jennifer S. Simpson argues that universities must eschew neutrality to advance democracy, ethics and the public good.
Mark Mercer argues that the academic ethos requires universities to remain neutral on issues of the day.
Mazen Guirguis argues that the university should return to its Socratic roots.
Matthew McKean and Valerie Walker argue that students aren't choosing between learning and work, so why should universities?
How to help students navigate the unwritten rules of the academy.
As academics compete for scarce resources, collective decision-making can lead to abuse — but that’s no reason to dismantle the system.
Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI has much to say about the culture of profit, technocracy and competition pervading today’s universities.