-
Institutional neutrality: the case against
Jennifer S. Simpson argues that universities must eschew neutrality to advance democracy, ethics and the public good.
Jennifer S. Simpson argues that universities must eschew neutrality to advance democracy, ethics and the public good.
Mark Mercer argues that the academic ethos requires universities to remain neutral on issues of the day.
The status quo is in desperate need of change.
Provincial government amends the bill's controversial section 5 after outrage from the higher education sector.
Current challenges offer opportunity to reassert our public purpose.
Government regulation of student fees, admissions criteria, cause controversy around new provincial education law.
Despite the ban on female higher education, a unique online program is training 146 Afghan women to become doctors.
McGill professors say academic freedom is at stake.
University of Regina Professor Marc Spooner analyzes the threats to academia’s public mission.
Defenders of democratic debate are rising to meet the challenges of ideological polarization, governmental interference, and underfunding of academic institutions.
Université de Montréal rector Daniel Jutras reflects on how Canadian universities are reacting to events in the U.S. and the grounds for optimism amid the turmoil.
Canadian historians caution against U.S. trend of political interference
Canada is balancing security imperatives and the need for diversity in academic research. How do we maintain our global commitments while protecting our national interests?
When international conflicts arise, Canadian universities have to juggle free speech and academic freedom, while also managing external pressures.