-
Institutional neutrality: the case in favour
Mark Mercer argues that the academic ethos requires universities to remain neutral on issues of the day.
Mark Mercer argues that the academic ethos requires universities to remain neutral on issues of the day.
Current challenges offer opportunity to reassert our public purpose.
Government regulation of student fees, admissions criteria, cause controversy around new provincial education law.
Despite the ban on female higher education, a unique online program is training 146 Afghan women to become doctors.
David Robinson, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, shares his thoughts on how the debate over the Israel-Hamas conflict is threatening fundamental principles of academia.
What the university could have done better to protect academic freedom after a professor’s controversial tweet went viral.
While my own academic freedom is less robust since becoming a senior administrator, I have loved finding new ways of defending academic freedom for others.
While some applaud the government’s approach, others find it lacking.
How do we manage academic freedom, which should be unhindered, unrestricted and inviolable?
Ultimately, the three best defences are good policies, good communication and good habits.
Even when it doesn’t improperly interfere in academic searches and tenure files, some kinds of donor funding routinely threaten academic freedom in a range of ways.
Academic freedom means academics can reflect on any topic, but can they fuel racist thinking?
Academic staff are not only employees; they are also the ‘collegium’ charged with the academic governance of universities.
When we invoke academic freedom as a way of defending our own peccadillos, we render universities into petty fiefdoms and academic freedom into a bludgeon.