-
Defending the Academy
Current challenges offer opportunity to reassert our public purpose.
Current challenges offer opportunity to reassert our public purpose.
Defenders of democratic debate are rising to meet the challenges of ideological polarization, governmental interference, and underfunding of academic institutions.
Université de Montréal rector Daniel Jutras reflects on how Canadian universities are reacting to events in the U.S. and the grounds for optimism amid the turmoil.
Canadian historians caution against U.S. trend of political interference
The notion that universities exist, first and foremost, to discover and impart knowledge is no longer in vogue. That’s a tragedy.
It is an adjustment when an academic becomes a senior administrator, as they don’t have the same academic freedoms they did as professors.
Just because professors may say the N-word doesn’t mean they should.
A recent case that has rocked the Canadian varsity running world raises questions about which university personnel should have academic freedom.
Is this thing on?
As universities respond to COVID-19, they must be guided by their core values of social responsibility, accountability and equitable access – all of which support suspending on-campus teaching and learning.
Two recent cases from the U.S. throw into sharp relief just how critical institutional autonomy is for academic freedom.
This definition was drawn up with great care by 33 countries, and with the usual negotiation and compromise common to all international agreements.
The definition adopted from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance is alarmingly vague and easily misinterpreted.
Academic freedom is not merely a negotiated perk of being a professor, it is a sine qua non of the university’s mission.