-
Why should academic freedom protect ineffective teaching?
The status quo is in desperate need of change.
The status quo is in desperate need of change.
McGill professors say academic freedom is at stake.
University of Regina Professor Marc Spooner analyzes the threats to academia’s public mission.
Defenders of democratic debate are rising to meet the challenges of ideological polarization, governmental interference, and underfunding of academic institutions.
An examination of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism.
What ever happened to students’ academic freedom?
The notion that universities exist, first and foremost, to discover and impart knowledge is no longer in vogue. That’s a tragedy.
It is an adjustment when an academic becomes a senior administrator, as they don’t have the same academic freedoms they did as professors.
Just because professors may say the N-word doesn’t mean they should.
A recent case that has rocked the Canadian varsity running world raises questions about which university personnel should have academic freedom.
Is this thing on?
As universities respond to COVID-19, they must be guided by their core values of social responsibility, accountability and equitable access – all of which support suspending on-campus teaching and learning.
Two recent cases from the U.S. throw into sharp relief just how critical institutional autonomy is for academic freedom.
This definition was drawn up with great care by 33 countries, and with the usual negotiation and compromise common to all international agreements.