-
Why should academic freedom protect ineffective teaching?
The status quo is in desperate need of change.
The status quo is in desperate need of change.
Institutions have been distracted from the vast potential of AI and are overreacting to the perceived threats.
Senior administrators and university boards need to do a better job setting up Black leaders for success.
The notion that the future of Canada lies in, or through, its universities is an increasingly hard sell.
The scientific community often relies on impromptu interactions to spur where the next set of experiments might go.
Students are the system’s principal stakeholders and we need to hear from them, especially as we contemplate the impacts of COVID-19.
A recent case that has rocked the Canadian varsity running world raises questions about which university personnel should have academic freedom.
Mothers are feeling the burn of having to both work and take on most parenting duties.
We must plan for online delivery throughout the upcoming academic year. Any other announcement is just wishful thinking.
The growth in both fully online and blended/hybrid learning is bound to accelerate – and both institutions and instructors had better prepare.
It’s not for a lack of qualified individuals. We simply have to decide that it’s important enough that we actually do it.
We must identify and resolve the gaps in our current scientific training, and revisit and refine the incentive structures we’ve created around our scientists.
A group of scholars offer a rebuttal to a recent article exploring the notions of “self-Indigenization” and “race-shifting.”
Educational institutions have long been concerned about the risk of being sued for copyright infringement, and a mass movement online introduces new issues.