-
Answering the “So what?” in SSHRC applications
How to articulate the expected scholarly outcomes of your proposed research project.
How to articulate the expected scholarly outcomes of your proposed research project.
Sometimes it isn’t just that certain terms offend people, it’s that the use of this language also implies a particular way of thinking.
Studies have shown that articles and manuscripts reviewed by a professional editor end up being better received by peer reviewers.
Advice for preparing your PowerPoints for September.
The criticism that some academic writing can be difficult to read shouldn’t be ignored.
The use of jargon can be effective in journal articles and grant applications - but use it sparingly when writing for a wider audience.
How to lighten your reader’s cognitive load in your academic writing.
A six-step approach for doing the (seemingly) impossible task of applying reviewer feedback to your journal article.
Ineffective colour can make an otherwise compelling image incomprehensible.
The singular “they” and your power to choose as an academic writer.
There are many tools that measure readability scores, but few contexts in which they’re useful for academics.
The political and persuasive significance of being intentionally hard to understand.
How to immerse yourself in the linguistic world in which your readers live, write, and think.
When authoring together, be innovative in language and structure, but conform to convention as you submit your work to be published.