-
Early-career researchers need to be the change they want to see
The status quo is not good enough, a new paper concludes.
The status quo is not good enough, a new paper concludes.
Once you know what type of brand you are aiming for, you can identify the values that your team should embrace.
This past year has accentuated issues that needed to have some light shone on them and we should be very careful not to push them back in the darkness.
Having a distinct brand that is integrated with your research program’s culture allows your team to define its strengths and intended contributions to a field.
The culture of scientific research desperately needs a makeover. Enter the eLife Ambassador program.
Translational research should be scientist-driven and institutionally supported, not the other way around.
After nearly 10 years, some issues have definitely moved on, but so many are still stuck in really dark and nasty places.
Feedback from multiple sources ensures that faculty are not disillusioning themselves with misguided opinions on their strengths and weaknesses.
Public perception of which cancers get research funding differs greatly from what actually gets funded. Here’s why.
While every organization is different, sharing best practices can help inform process development.
It is sad that highly-qualified, highly-educated scientific researchers need to worry about pleading their case to have a national pension contribution.
The scientific profession is not for everyone, but there is no reason why we should actively be forcing people out.
How about offering permanent lecturers the ability to undertake research in a leading lab in the same department?
While no one is arguing for funding failure, the challenge is how we define “success.”