Quarterly summary: From startups to dropouts

After nearly 10 years, some issues have definitely moved on, but so many are still stuck in really dark and nasty places.

July 27, 2018
hands on laptop keyboard to write on laptop

It’s been a long “quarter” – turns out we haven’t summarised our blogging activity since February. Apologies to our readers that rely on these summaries to do their catch-up; we’ll do better in future.

Since this has been such a long period of blogs, the themes are not quite so easy to extract. Jonathan blogged about his experience launching a startup company and on some interpersonal issues like 360 faculty review and researcher vulnerability. And I’ve been even more broad in topic selection, flitting from research-funding perceptions (and realities with NSERC-funding rate discussion) and exploring new ways of communicating academic science alongside understanding the way project proposals get evaluated in the first place. After nearly 10 years of writing articles on the Black Hole blog, some things have definitely moved on, but so many things are still stuck in really dark and nasty places – the fight goes on!

This quarter we’ve been delighted to have guest blogger Kevin Leland and always welcome our readers to submit their stories:

Jonathan and I have also continued to write regularly with our posts summarised below:

Jonathan

Dave

Thanks for your attention over the last 10 years. We appreciate all of the great discussions and hope that the next several years will be just as fruitful – we also hope that we can start tracking some real progress in how we educate and train scientists while identifying the best way to move their research out in practical ways in the spaces of medicine and business.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.